United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Nan Crandall, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

98 F.3d 1347 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. Nan CRANDALL, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. No. 94-50124, 94-50159. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 8, 1995. Submission Vacated Aug. 11, 1995. Resubmitted Sept. 5, 1996. Decided Sept. 11, 1996. ORDER This case is hereby RESUBMITTED as of September 5, 1996. Before: BROWNING, NORRIS, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 The appellant challenges her conviction and also raises a number of sentencing issues. We affirm her conviction but vacate her sentence and remand for sentencing. The Conviction 3 First, we reject Crandall's contention that conviction for accepting illegal gratuities in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 201 (b)(2)(A) requires the government to prove that she received a quid pro quo for her favors. See United States v. Strand, 574 F.2d 993 , 995 & n. 2 (9th Cir.1978) (gifts need…