United States v. Ricky David Koon
Opinion
Opinion
98 F.3d 1347 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricky David KOON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-50601. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. * Decided Oct. 9, 1996. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ricky David Koon appeals his 151-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea to unarmed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). Koon contends that the district court erred by determining that two prior robbery convictions were unrelated under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(a)(2) and sentencing him as a career offender pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. Koon argues that his prior convictions were related because they involved crimes that were part of a common scheme or plan. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (a), 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and affirm. 3 Two prior felony convictions are considered related for career offender…