United States v. Peter Allen Jesser

Good Law
98 F.3d 1347·1996 WL 588521·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38607
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 11, 199696-30038California295 words

Opinion

Opinion

98 F.3d 1347 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Peter Allen JESSER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-30038. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. * Decided Oct. 11, 1996. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Peter Allen Jesser appeals his sentence imposed following his guilty plea to unarmed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). Jesser contends that in adjusting his offense level upward under U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(2)(F), the district court erred by concluding Jesser made an express threat of death to a teller while robbing the bank. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Jesser contends that his note to the bank teller which read: "I have a gun. Don't be stupid," is not sufficient to constitute an express threat of death under the Guidelines because Jesser's note did not include words which signify…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.