United States v. William E. Harvey

98 F.3d 1347 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William E. HARVEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-35712. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. * Decided Oct. 10, 1996. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William E. Harvey appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his guilty plea conviction and 188-month sentence for three counts of distribution of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 . Harvey contends that: (1) his plea was involuntary because the government failed to furnish him with exculpatory information; (2) the court was not informed of the contingent nature of the plea agreement; (3) the district court and the government breached the plea agreement; (4) the government improperly obtained his guilty plea through coercion; (5) the district court…