United States v. Felipe Arrevalo Garcia

Good Law
98 F.3d 1347·1996 WL 588477·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38612
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 11, 199695-10189California339 words

Opinion

Opinion

98 F.3d 1347 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Felipe Arrevalo GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-10189. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. * Decided Oct. 11, 1996. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Felipe A. Garcia appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines for his jury conviction of conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine and manufacturing methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1), and 18 U.S.C. § 2 . Garcia contends that his sentence should be vacated because the district court failed to make the necessary factual findings at sentencing as to the amount of drugs implicated in the drug conspiracy. In United States v. Gutierrez-Hernandez, No. 95-10188, slip op. 10809 (9th Cir. August 28, 1996), we affirmed codefendant Gutierrez-Hernandez's sentence on the same grounds raised by Garcia.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.