United States v. Ernest Joe Maddox

98 F.3d 1347 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ernest Joe MADDOX, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10466. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. * Decided Oct. 9, 1996. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ernest Joe Maddox, in pro per, appeals his sentence after pleading guilty to making false statements to a financial institution in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014 . He contends the district court erred when it ordered him to: (a) perform 200 hours of community service; and (b) pay $20,000 in restitution. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for an abuse of discretion. Malone v. United States, 502 F.2d 554, 556 (9th Cir.1974) (probation conditions), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1124 (1975); United States v. Angelica, 859 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir.1988) (restitution). We affirm. 3 In 1993, Maddox pleaded guilty to making…