United States v. Quintin L. Beck

98 F.3d 1347 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Quintin L. BECK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-30251. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. * Decided Oct. 11, 1996. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Quintin L. Beck appeals his 24-month sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. Beck contends that: (1) there is insufficient evidence to support the district court's finding that he possessed controlled substances with intent to distribute; (2) he did not receive adequate notice that one of the alleged violations was possession of controlled substances with intent to distribute; and (3) his right of confrontation was violated by the court's admission of hearsay testimony at the revocation hearing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and affirm. 3 We review for clear error the factual findings underlying a…