United States v. Glenda Lee McCracken

98 F.3d 1347 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Glenda Lee McCRACKEN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-30389. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. * Decided Oct. 9, 1996. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Glenda Lee McCracken appeals the district court's denial of her motion to extend the time for filing her notice of appeal due to excusable neglect, following the denial of her 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2) motion. McCracken contends the district court abused its discretion by denying the motion for an extension of time. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for an abuse of discretion, United States v. Prairie Pharmacy, Inc., 921 F.2d 211, 212 (9th Cir.1990), and affirm. 3 The district court may grant an extension of time under Fed.R.App.P. 4(b) to file the notice of appeal if it finds excusable neglect for failing to…