United States v. Lowell E. Jackson, Jr.

Good Law
98 F.3d 1347·1996 WL 583634·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38626
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 9, 199696-35204California271 words

Opinion

Opinion

98 F.3d 1347 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lowell E. JACKSON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-35204. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. * Decided Oct. 9, 1996. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Lowell Jackson, Jr. ("Jackson") appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion following his conviction by guilty plea to one count of distributing cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 . We affirm. 3 Jackson argues that his federal conviction for distribution of cocaine base should be overturned based on double jeopardy grounds, violations of the Fourth Amendment and ineffective assistance of counsel. 4 Insofar as we can determine from the record, all of appellant's issues on appeal relate to a state police traffic stop and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.