United States v. Robert Wilson

98 F.3d 1348 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert WILSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-16894. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. * Decided Oct. 10, 1996. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert Wilson appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his 58-month sentence for various firearms offenses. Wilson contends the district court erred by dismissing his section 2255 motion because: (1) his business office was illegally searched; and (2) the government withheld exculpatory evidence from him. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2255. We review de novo the district court's denial of Wilson's motion, Sanchez v. United States, 50 F.3d 1448, 1451-52 (9th Cir.1995), and affirm. 3 Wilson contends that his business office was illegally searched and therefore any…