United States v. Raymundo Vindiola

98 F.3d 1348 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymundo VINDIOLA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-16742. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. * Decided Oct. 11, 1996. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Raymundo Vindiola, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his conviction for possession with intent to distribute marijuana and for conspiracy to possess marijuana with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 846. Vindiola contends that trial counsel was ineffective because he: (1) failed to file a motion to suppress or attempt to impeach a photo identification of Vindiola; (2) allowed Vindiola to testify at trial; (3) opened the door to the admission of the drug ledgers; (4) opened the door to cross-examination regarding civil…