United States v. Aziz Sharrieff, United States of America v. Trina Devay Harper, United States of America v. Carlos Munoz

Good Law
98 F.3d 1348·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38657
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 1, 199695-50080California1,556 words

Opinion

Opinion

98 F.3d 1348 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Aziz SHARRIEFF, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Trina Devay HARPER, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos MUNOZ, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 95-50080, 95-50102 and 95-50166. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued Dec. 13, 1995. Submitted Jan. 22, 1996. Decided Oct. 1, 1996. Before: SCHROEDER, FERGUSON, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Aziz Sharrieff, Trina Harper and Carlos Munoz appeal their sentences for conspiracy to commit armed robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 , and carrying a firearm during a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c). They argue that the district court erred by (1) failing to grant them a three-level reduction in their conspiracy sentences pursuant to Sentencing Guideline § 2X1.1(b)(2) and (2)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.