Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and Commissioner of Corporations of the State of California v. Frankwell Bullion Limited Frankwell Investment Services Inc. Maywell Investment Services, Inc. Frankwell Investment Services (Texas) Inc. Frankwell Management Service (New York) Inc., Thomas Taylor, Iii, Receiver. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Frankwell Bullion Limited Frankwell Investment Services Inc. Maywell Investment Services, Inc. Frankwell Investment Services (Texas) Inc. Frankwell Management Service (New York) Inc.

Good Law
96 Daily Journal DAR 13081·99 F.3d 299·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 27921·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7881
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 29, 199695-16977California4,575 words

Opinion

Opinion

99 F.3d 299 65 USLW 2336 , Comm. Fut. L. Rep. P 26,807 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7881 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13 ,081 COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Commissioner of Corporations of the State of California, Plaintiff, v. FRANKWELL BULLION LIMITED; Frankwell Investment Services Inc.; Maywell Investment Services, Inc.; Frankwell Investment Services (Texas) Inc.; Frankwell Management Service (New York) Inc., Defendants-Appellees. Thomas Taylor, III, Receiver. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FRANKWELL BULLION LIMITED; Frankwell Investment Services Inc.; Maywell Investment Services, Inc.; Frankwell Investment Services (Texas) Inc.; Frankwell Management Service (New York) Inc., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 95-16977, 95-17298. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 17, 1996. Decided Oct. 29, 1996. Jay L. Witkin, Deputy General Counsel, and James T. Kelly, Assistant General Counsel, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellant. Paul S. Schmidtberger and Gary L. Benton, Coudert Brothers, San Francisco, California, for defendants-appellees. Mark D. Young,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.