96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7895, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13,071, Pens. Plan Guide P 23928i William Duggan v. Danny Hobbs, Individually and as Administrator of the Chemworld Corporation Agreement Plan

Good Law
99 F.3d 307
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 29, 199695-15863California4,219 words

Opinion

Opinion

99 F.3d 307 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7895 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13,071, Pens. Plan Guide P 23928I William DUGGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Danny HOBBS, individually and as Administrator of the Chemworld Corporation Agreement Plan, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-15863. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 15, 1996. * Decided Oct. 29, 1996. William J. Hooy, Concord, CA, for plaintiff-appellant. Danny G. Hobbs, Kelseyville, CA, in propria persona for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Eugene F. Lynch, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-93-00316-EFL. Before: SNEED, JOHN T. NOONAN, Jr., and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge: 1 William Duggan entered into a severance agreement with his employer, Chemworld Corporation (the Agreement), under which he was to receive retirement benefits for life. When Chemworld terminated payments due under the Agreement, Duggan sued Chemworld and its President, Danny G. Hobbs, for breach of contract and for violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). 2 The district court dismissed the breach of contract…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.