Moreno Roofing Company, Inc. v. Nagle

Good Law
96 Daily Journal DAR 13215·99 F.3d 340·153 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2705·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28261·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7968
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 31, 199695-16044California1,759 words

Opinion

Opinion

99 F.3d 340 153 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2705 , 65 USLW 2313 , Unempl.Ins.Rep. (CCH) P 22,166 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7968 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13 ,215 MORENO ROOFING COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas P. NAGLE; State of California, Employment Development Department; James S. Scott, in his official capacity as Regional Director of Region 32 of the National Labor Relations Board, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16044. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 2, 1996. Decided Oct. 31, 1996. Mark R. Thierman, San Francisco, CA, for plaintiff-appellant. Ralph M. Johnson, Deputy Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for state defendant-appellee. Margery E. Lieber and Mark R. Gisler, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for federal defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Claudia Wilken, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-94-03121-CW. Before: SKOPIL and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and RHOADES, District Judge. * SKOPIL, Senior Circuit Judge: 1 The issue posited is whether a state law that requires an employer to repay state unemployment benefits when a worker receives a back…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.