96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7965, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13,217 in Re Pnp Holdings Corporation and Pay 'N Pak Stores, Inc., Debtors. Tucker Plastics, Inc. v. Pay 'N Pak Stores, Inc.

Good Law
99 F.3d 910
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 31, 199695-35871California373 words

Opinion

Opinion

99 F.3d 910 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7965 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13,217 In re PNP HOLDINGS CORPORATION and Pay 'N Pak Stores, Inc., Debtors. TUCKER PLASTICS, INC., Appellant, v. PAY 'N PAK STORES, INC., Appellee. No. 95-35871. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 10, 1996. Decided Oct. 31, 1996. Arnold B. Robbins, Breskin & Robbins, Seattle, WA, for defendant-appellant. John J. Mitchell, Lane Powell Spears Lubersky, Seattle, WA, for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Ashland, Hagan and Tchaikovsky, Presiding Judges. BAP No. WW-94-02207-AsHT. Before BROWNING, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 Tucker Plastics, Inc. filed a proof of claim in Pay 'N Pak Stores, Inc.'s Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding. Later, the trustee in Pay 'N Pak's bankruptcy estate initiated a preference action against Tucker. Tucker, a Canadian corporation, filed a motion for summary judgment, contesting the bankruptcy court's personal jurisdiction. The bankruptcy court denied the motion, holding that under Katchen v. Landy, 382 U.S. 323, 335 , 86 S.Ct. 467, 475-76 , 15 L.Ed.2d 391 (1966), a creditor who…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.