Hower

Hower v. Pacificare of California

Good Law
36 F. App'x 250
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 2, 2002No. 01-55467; D.C. CV-00-00987-GLTCalifornia420 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Jeannette Hower (“Hower”) filed a lawsuit alleging tortious breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing when her insurance company, Pacificare of California, failed to refer her to specialists who could properly treat her Lyme disease. Pacificare removed the case to federal court, and filed a motion to dismiss on the basis that Hower’s claims were preempted by ERISA. Hower moved to remand the case to state court, arguing that the tortious breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing fit under the insurance savings clause in ERISA. The parties are otherwise familiar with the facts, and we do not repeat them here.

The district court held that Hower’s cause of action was preempted by ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1144 (a), because it was a law that regulated insurance, but that it was not saved, because of the Supreme Court’s decision in Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. Dedeaux, 481 U.S. 41, 57 , 107 S.Ct. 1549 , 95 L.Ed.2d 39 (1987) and the Ninth Circuit’s decisions in Parrino v. FHP, Inc., 146 F.3d 699, 704-05 (9th Cir.1998) and Kanne v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co., 867 F.2d 489, 494 (9th Cir.1988). The court granted Pacificare’s motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.