Pedroza-Ballina

United States v. Pedroza-Ballina

Good Law
39 F. App'x 552
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 23, 2002No. 01-10124; D.C. No. CR 99-1080 ROSCalifornia659 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Pedro Pedroza-Ballina (“Pedroza”) appeals his conviction and sentence for being a deported alien “found in” the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (a), and we affirm the conviction, vacate the sentence, and remand for resentencing.

The district court did not err by declining to suppress Pedroza’s inculpatory statements as involuntary based upon his claim that the waiver of his Miranda rights was invalid. Under the “totality of the circumstances,” Pedroza’s Miranda waiver was “voluntary, knowing, and intelligent.” See United States v. Garibay, 143 F.3d 534, 536 (9th Cir.1998). He was ad *554 vised of his rights in Spanish, which is his native tongue; appeared to understand those rights; had prior experience with the criminal justice system; and signed a written waiver in Spanish attesting to the fact that he understood his rights and was willing to give up them up and answer questions without a lawyer present. See id. at 538 . In light of the signed, written waiver and the absence of an explanation for how the agent’s lack of familiarity with the Spanish term for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.