Vazquez-Dehonor

United States v. Vazquez-Dehonor

Good Law
40 F. App'x 508
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 14, 2002No. 00-50538; D.C. No. CR-00-00648-WBECalifornia227 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jesus Vazquez-Dehonor appeals his guilty plea conviction and 18-month prison sentence for importing marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we dismiss in part and affirm in part.

Vazquez-Dehonor first contends the district court erred by declining his request for a downward departure based on aberrant behavior. Because the record demonstrates the district court exercised its discretion by expressly denying Vazquez-Dehonor’s request for a downward departure, we lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s decision. See United States v. Berger, 103 F.3d 67, 70 (9th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, we dismiss this portion of the appeal.

Vazquez-Dehonor’s challenge to the constitutionality of 28 U.S.C. § 960 under Ap-prendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Mendoza-Paz, 286 F.3d 1104, 1110 (9th Cir.2002). His contention that the indictment should be dismissed because it did not allege mens rea as to drug type and quantity is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Carranza, 289 F.3d 634, 644 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.