Turner

United States v. Turner

Good Law
40 F. App'x 512
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 14, 2002No. 01-10419; D.C. No. CR-99-05321-AWICalifornia795 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Curtis James Turner appeals the conditions of his 25 month term of supervised release imposed following his violation of the conditions of his prior term of release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . Because Turner did not object to the terms of his supervised release at sentencing, we review for plain error. United States v. Jordan, 256 F.3d 922, 926 (9th Cir.2001). We affirm.

Turner first contends that the district court erred by requiring him to submit to warrantless searches of his person, property, home, and vehicle, as such a requirement is not reasonably related to the nature and circumstances of the offense committed. This contention lacks merit.

In addition to the three year scheme to defraud his life insurance clients for which he was convicted, the record shows that Turner violated his prior term of supervised release by breaching the terms of his house arrest, unlawfully taking a car, and *514 refusing to take a drug test. The record further shows that Turner admitted to having used cocaine monthly for more than 10 years, and at sentencing on his initial supervised release violation, conceded that he was suffering from drug addiction.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.