Turner
United States v. Turner
Opinion
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Curtis James Turner appeals the conditions of his 25 month term of supervised release imposed following his violation of the conditions of his prior term of release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . Because Turner did not object to the terms of his supervised release at sentencing, we review for plain error. United States v. Jordan, 256 F.3d 922, 926 (9th Cir.2001). We affirm.
Turner first contends that the district court erred by requiring him to submit to warrantless searches of his person, property, home, and vehicle, as such a requirement is not reasonably related to the nature and circumstances of the offense committed. This contention lacks merit.
In addition to the three year scheme to defraud his life insurance clients for which he was convicted, the record shows that Turner violated his prior term of supervised release by breaching the terms of his house arrest, unlawfully taking a car, and *514 refusing to take a drug test. The record further shows that Turner admitted to having used cocaine monthly for more than 10 years, and at sentencing on his initial supervised release violation, conceded that he was suffering from drug addiction.…