Jones

MEMORANDUM **

Darrell Jones appeals his guilty plea conviction for two counts of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). We have jurisdiction pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . Reviewing for plain error, United States v. Vonn, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 1043, 1046 , 152 L.Ed.2d 90 (2002), we affirm.

Jones contends that the district court erred under Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(c)(1) be *521 cause it failed to inform him of the nature of the charges against him before accepting his guilty plea. The government concedes that there was a technical error under Rule 11(c), but argues that the error did not affect Jones’ substantial rights. We agree.

A review of the record demonstrates that Jones was provided with a copy of the indictment, which informed Jones of both the charges against him and the statute of conviction before the guilty-plea hearing. Bousley v. United States, 523 U.S. 614, 618 , 118 S.Ct. 1604 , 140 L.Ed.2d 828 (noting that a defendant who is given a copy of his indictment before pleading guilty is presumed to know the nature of the charges against him). The record further indicates that Jones understood the nature of the charges and accepted the factual basis of his guilty-plea…