Schneider

Schneider v. England

Good Law
40 F. App'x 575
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 25, 2002No. 01-55941; D.C. No. CV-96-06665-MRPCalifornia261 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

David Schneider brought this mixed claim action against the Secretary of the Navy on the bases that he had been discriminated against on account of a disability and that he had been retaliated against for whistleblowing. At an earlier time, the district court granted summary judgment to the Secretary on the discrimination claim. We affirmed. 1 Schneider now appeals the district court’s later dismissal of the nondiscrimination (whistleblower) claim. The dismissal was based upon Schneider’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. We affirm.

There can be no doubt that Schneider failed to present his whistleblower retaliation claim to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) before he brought his mixed claim action in the district court. Thus, he has not preserved that claim for judicial review. See Sloan v. West, 140 F.3d 1255, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1998); see also Nater V. Riley, 114 F.Supp.2d 17, 24 (D.P.R.2000), aff'd, 2001 WL 828290 , 15 Fed.Appx. 11 (1st Cir. July 23, 2001) (unpublished disposition), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 1544 , 152 L.Ed.2d 470 (2002). Indeed, when an employee bypasses the MSPB, federal courts cannot possibly apply the proper…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.