Sherman

Sherman v. Roe

Good Law
41 F. App'x 914
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 16, 2002No. 00-55975; D.C. No. CV-98-00172-AHSCalifornia55 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

We affirm the denial of Sherman’s habeas petition for reasons stated in Magistrate Judge Zarefsky’s Report and Recommendation and adopted by the district court.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.