Alarcon

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Luis Alarcon appeals his 120-month sentence following his guilty-plea conviction for importing 29.13 kilograms of cocaine to the United States, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 , 960. Because we lack jurisdiction over the appeal, we dismiss it.

We review de novo the validity of a waiver of the right to appeal. United States v. Aguilar-Muniz, 156 F.3d 974, 976 (9th Cir.1998). In his plea agreement, Alarcon waived “to the full extent of the law” his right to appeal his sentence or his conviction. There is no indication in the record that the district court failed to comply with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, or that the plea and waiver were not knowing and voluntary. See United States v. Aguilar-Muniz, 156 F.3d 974, 976 (9th Cir.1998) Moreover, the district court’s advisement during Alarcon’s sentencing hearing concerning Alarcon's potential right to appeal did not revive his appellate rights. See id. at 977 (9th Cir.1998) (holding right to appeal, waived in plea agreement, not revived where district court had advised defendant during sentencing that he may have waived some or all of his right to appeal); United States v. Schuman, 127 F.3d 815, 816 (9th…