Analla

Analla v. Henderson

Good Law
42 F. App'x 68
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 15, 2002No. 00-15460; D.C. No. CV-98-04151-PJHCalifornia537 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

After taking leave for stress from her job as a part-time clerk at a United States post office, Valerie Analla brought suit against the United States Postal Service (USPS) under Title VII of the Civil Rights Acts and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. She appeals the district *70 court’s summary judgment on claims that USPS discriminated against her because of her sex and age. We affirm.

I

Analla argues that USPS filed a statement of undisputed facts that was not jointly prepared pursuant to the Local Rules, and that the district court erred in failing to consider her opposition. USPS acknowledged its error, but the error has no consequence because Analla’s counter statement was before the district court and there is no indication that it was not considered. All that the court noted is that Analla’s opposition provided no argument based on facts supported by evidence to indicate that a prima facie case was established. Contrary to her position on appeal, the court had no obligation to consider papers filed later, for purposes of trial, after the summary judgment motion had been submitted.

II

Assuming that each of the actions that she attributes to Bishop…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.