Garcia-Hernandez

Garcia-Hernandez v. United States

Good Law
43 F. App'x 133
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 30, 2002No. 01-56538; D.C. No. CV-01-00211-K CR-98-03224-KCalifornia202 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Roberto Garcia Hernandez appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, challenging the 70-month sentence he received following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 . We review de novo a district court’s decision to deny a § 2255 petition. United States v. Sanchez-Cervantes, 282 F.3d 664, 666 (9th Cir.2002), and we affirm.

Garcia-Hernandez contends that the district court erred in denying his section 2255 motion because a prior aggravated felony conviction is an element of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Because we do not apply Apprendi retroactively to cases on collateral review, Garcia-Hernandez’s claim is barred. See Sanchez-Cervantes, 282 F.3d at 671 ; see also United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411, 413-15 (9th Cir.) (rejecting the merits of a similar challenge on direct appeal), cert. denied, 121 S.Ct. 1503 (2001).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.