Buckner v. County of Napa

99 F.3d 1145 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charlotte BUCKNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF NAPA; R.S. Hill, M.D., individually and in his capacity as Director of Health Services, Napa County Dept. of Public Health; Sherrie Pittman, individually and in her capacity as Director of Nursing, Napa County Dept. of Public Health; Allen Clemons, individually and in his capacity as Supervising Correctional Nurse, Napa County Dept. of Public Health, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-16327. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 11, 1996. * Decided Oct. 25, 1996. 1 Before: GOODWIN and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges, and FITZGERALD, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Charlotte Buckner, a correctional nurse with the Napa County Department of Public Health, appeals the district court's summary judgment in favor of Napa County (the "County"); the Department's Director of Nursing, Sharrie Pittman; the Department's Director of Health Services, R.S.…