American States Ins. Co. v. Sacramento Plating Inc.

99 F.3d 1145 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellee, v. SACRAMENTO PLATING INC.; Richard Perry; Arlene Perry; Dale Carter; RAR Marketing Inc; Alice Kazanjian, Defendants. Arthur LABOUR, Defendant-counter-claimant-Appellant, v. ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Counter-defendant-Appellee. No. 94-16905. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 16, 1996. Decided Oct. 25, 1996. 1 Before: BEEZER and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and GILLMOR, * District Judge. 2 Memorandum ** 3 Arthur A. Labour appeals the district court's entry of summary judgment for American States Insurance Company ("ASI") and Royal Insurance Company ("Royal") in an action for declaratory judgment and breach of contract arising out of ASI's and Royal's refusal to provide coverage under several comprehensive general liability policies for costs associated with Labour's compliance with an "Imminent…