Francine Ferrero v. Mare-Bear, Inc., Dba the Stardust Hotel and Casino, Francine Ferrero v. Mare-Bear, Inc., Dba the Stardust Hotel and Casino

99 F.3d 1145 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Francine FERRERO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARE-BEAR, INC., dba The Stardust Hotel and Casino, Defendant-Appellee. Francine FERRERO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARE-BEAR, INC., dba The Stardust Hotel and Casino, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 95-16480, 95-16671. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 11, 1996. Decided Oct. 22, 1996. Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Francine Ferrero appeals the judgment, entered after a bench trial, in favor of Mare-Bear, Inc. (the Stardust) in her Title VII action alleging that the Stardust retaliated against her for opposing sexual harassment or gender discrimination. We affirm. 3 This appeal turns on Ferrero's argument that her July 2 letter was protected activity and that the court erred in holding otherwise. We cannot agree. While her letter details a number of incidents of unfair treatment by Van Dura, it does not…