In re California Micro Devices Securities Litigation

99 F.3d 1145 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re CALIFORNIA MICRO DEVICES SECURITIES LITIGATION. Michael FEDER; Wayne Lederer; Colorado Public Employees' Retirement Association, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CALIFORNIA MICRO DEVICES; Steven J. Henke; Surendra Gupta; Ronald A. Romito; Ashok K. Chalaka; Ramanarao V. Penumarty; Bhasker B. Roa, Defendants, Chan M. Desaigoudar, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-16156. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. * Decided Oct. 15, 1996. 1 Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 This appeal from the grant of a motion for a preliminary injunction comes to us for review under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a)(1), and we affirm. 4 "The grant or denial of a preliminary injunction will be reversed only where the district court abused its discretion or based its decision on an erroneous legal standard or on clearly erroneous…