Sbrocca v. Ahearn

Good Law
99 F.3d 1146·1996 WL 612723·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 40420
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 21, 199695-16206California723 words

Opinion

Opinion

99 F.3d 1146 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Roseanne Marie SBROCCA, a married woman, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James AHEARN, husband; Barbara Ahearn, wife; Susan Schillie, wife; Donald W. Tucker, husband; Annette Tucker, wife; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees, and John Doe Schillie, husband; Unknown Officers and Employees of the Federal Bureau of Investigation I-X; Unknown Officers and Employees of the U.S. Marshal Service XI-XX; Unknown Officers of Federal, State and Local Agencies XXI-XXX; Robert E. Casey; Jane Doe Casey, Defendants. No. 95-16206. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 10, 1996. Decided Oct. 21, 1996. Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Roseanne Marie Sbrocca appeals the summary judgment entered on her claims against the United States and several law enforcement officers for violating her Fourth Amendment rights in connection with execution of arrest warrants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.