Sony Nov v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
99 F.3d 1146·1996 WL 596243·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 40425
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 16, 199695-70361California627 words

Opinion

Opinion

99 F.3d 1146 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Sony NOV, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 95-70361. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 8, 1996. * Decided Oct. 16, 1996. Petition to Review a Decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, No. Azd-oit-dsx. B.I.A. REVIEW DENIED. Before: WALLACE, SNEED, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Sony Nov, a native and citizen of Cambodia, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge's order of deportation and denying his motion to remand to enable him to apply for asylum, withholding of deportation, and adjustment of status. We deny the petition for review. 3 * On April 24, 1996, Congress enacted the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. Included in the AEDPA is a provision removing judicial review of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.