Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Good Law
44 F. App'x 170
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 6, 2002Nos. 01-71251, 01-71270, 01-71297, 01-71303; FERC Nos. ER99-3713, EL-98-46California907 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Pacific Gas & Electric Company (“PG&E”) and the Southern California Edison Company (“Edison”) (together, “Petitioners”) petition for review from a decision of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) denying rehearing of its order which accepted for filing an executed Interconnection Agreement (“LA”) between PG&E and Fresno Irrigation District as well as a similar agreement between Edison and Laguna Irrigation District. FERC required PG&E and Edison to provide a series of “wholesale” electrical interconnections to Laguna and to Fresno so that Laguna and Fresno could take advantage of a California retail access program and enhance competition in the market of electricity.

We have jurisdiction pursuant to Section 813(b) of the Federal Power Act (“FPA”), 16 U.S.C. § 8251(b) and we affirm. Because the parties are familiar with the procedural and factual history of this case, we do not recount it here except as necessary to explain our decision.

As this case concerns the Commission’s interpretation of the FPA, we will follow the framework enunciated in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837 , 104 S.Ct. 2778 , 81 L.Ed.2d 694…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.