Thomas
Thomas v. Marshall
44 F. App'x 277
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 16, 2002No. 00-15312; D.C. No. CV-00-00142-TEHCalifornia114 words
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Keith Thomas, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing without leave to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint alleging that officials at Pelican Bay State Prison violated his constitutional rights by reading his outgoing non-legal mail. We review de novo dismissals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000), and we affirm.
We conclude that the district court properly dismissed Thomas’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.