Samuel Larklam v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

99 F.3d 1146 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Samuel LARKLAM, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 95-70743. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 11, 1996. * Decided Oct. 25, 1996. Petition to Review a Decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, No. Aju-dkq-jdl. B.I.A. REVIEW GRANTED. Before: PREGERSON, BOOCHEVER, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Samuel Larklam is a fifty-year old native and citizen of Burma. He entered the United States through Seattle, Washington, on or about June 17, 1989, with a year-long non-immigrant visa. Prior to entering this country, petitioner was residing as an illegal alien in Thailand. 3 At a deportation hearing held before an Immigration Judge, petitioner conceded deportability and testified in support of his application for asylum and withholding of deportation on the ground that if returned to Thailand, he will be deported to Burma because…