Marshak v. Sierra Vista Unified Schools

Good Law
99 F.3d 1146·1996 WL 560220·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 40432
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 30, 199695-15795California1,703 words

Opinion

Opinion

99 F.3d 1146 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John MARSHAK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SIERRA VISTA UNIFIED SCHOOLS, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona; Jon Lokensgard, in his individual capacity and as superintendent of the Sierra Unified Schools; Claude Sanders, in his individual capacity and as assistant superintendent of the Sierra Unified Schools, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15795. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 19, 1996. * Decided Sept. 30, 1996. 1 Before: BEEZER and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and GILLMOR, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Marshak appeals from the district court's summary judgment for Sierra Vista Unified Schools (District). The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343(a). We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. 4 Marshak argues that the district court erroneously entered summary judgment on his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.