United States v. Nicholas Elizarraras-Munoz, United States of America v. Jose Luis Medina-Rodriguez

99 F.3d 1147 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nicholas ELIZARRARAS-MUNOZ, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Luis MEDINA-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 95-50479, 96-50006. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. Decided Oct. 22, 1996. ORDER The above cases are consolidated for purposes of disposition. Before: HUG, Chief Judge; PREGERSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellants Medina-Rodriguez and Elizarraras-Munoz appeal the district courts' denials of their motions for discovery of information relating to selective prosecution challenges. These two cases, which present identical issues, were consolidated for oral argument. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. BACKGROUND Medina-Rodriguez 3 On March 14, 1995, Medina-Rodriguez was charged with illegal reentry by a previously…