3570 Foothill Boulevard Inc., a California Corporation v. City of Pasadena, a Municipal Corporation

Good Law
99 F.3d 1147·1996 WL 593174·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 40338
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 15, 199696-55737California291 words

Opinion

Opinion

99 F.3d 1147 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 3570 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CITY OF PASADENA, a municipal corporation, Defendant/Appellee. No. 96-55737. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. * Decided Oct. 15, 1996. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 This appeal from the denial of a motion for a preliminary injunction comes to us for review under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a)(1), and we affirm. 3 "A district court's order regarding preliminary injunctive relief is subject to limited review." Does 1-5 v. Chandler, 83 F.3d 1150, 1152 (9th Cir.1996). The denial of a preliminary injunction "should be upheld unless the court incorrectly applied the law, relied on clearly erroneous factual findings, or otherwise abused its discretion." Id. 4 The record before us shows that the court did not rely on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.