Jesus Maya Tellez, Aka: Jesus Tellez v. Ernest C. Roe, Warden

Good Law
99 F.3d 1147·1996 WL 612780
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 21, 199695-56677California1,217 words

Opinion

Opinion

99 F.3d 1147 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jesus Maya TELLEZ, aka: Jesus Tellez Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ernest C. ROE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 95-56677. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 10, 1996. * Decided Oct. 21, 1996. Before: BRUNETTI, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jesus Maya Tellez, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition challenging his conviction for first degree murder and attempted murder on a theory of aiding and abetting. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 , and we affirm. 1 3 Tellez raises three claims on appeal. First, he claims the district court erred when it held that he constitutional violation that resulted from the readback of trial testimony to the jury outside of his presence was harmless error. Second, he contends the district court erred when it held: 1) that Tellez's trial counsel was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.