United States v. De Santos

99 F.3d 1147 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clemente De Santos DE SANTOS, aka Isidro Chavez-Rodriguez; aka Clemente De Santos-Gonzalez aka Clemente De Santos; aka Manuel Perez-Perez; aka Daniel De Santos-De Santos; aka Juan Perez-Perez; aka Daniel Perez-Perez, aka Daniel Peres; aka Manuel Peres; aka Daniel De Santos-Perez; aka Daniel Perez-De Santos; aka Daniel De Santos; aka Juan Peres, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-30069. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 11, 1996. * Decided Oct. 17, 1996. Before: BROWNING, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 The district court committed no reviewable error in sentencing DeSantos. 3 DeSantos' argument that the 16-level increase in offense level overrepresented his prior record was considered by the district court even though the court did not explicitly acknowledge its authority to depart under United States v.…