United States v. Robin Lawrence

99 F.3d 1147 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robin LAWRENCE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-50566. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 10, 1996. Decided Oct. 25, 1996. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, T.G. NELSON and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Following entry of his guilty plea to one count of wire fraud arising out of a fraudulent loan transaction, Robin Lawrence timely appeals the district court's sentence and restitution order. Lawrence contests the district court's computation of loss for sentencing purposes and alleges that the district court improperly required restitution despite Lawrence's clear inability to pay it. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . 3 We review de novo a district court's interpretation and application of the sentencing guidelines, United States v. Shaw, 3 F.3d 311, 312 (9th Cir.1993), and we review factual determinations in…