United States v. Anna Dolores Cantu

99 F.3d 1147 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anna Dolores CANTU, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-50549. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. Decided Oct. 17, 1996. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, T.G. NELSON and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Anna Dolores Cantu ("Cantu") timely appeals the district court's judgment which ordered restitution in the amount of $39,903.44, following her conviction and sentencing on two counts of making false statements to a financial institution ("the bank") in connection with a loan application. We review the amount of restitution ordered for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Catherine, 55 F.3d 1462, 1465 (9th Cir.1995). We affirm with modifications. I. 3 The calculation of restitution begins with the balance of the loan at the time of default. The district court accepted the bank's report that the principal balance at the time of…