Brundage-Bone Concrete Pumping, Inc. v. Concord Commercial Division of HSBC Business Loans, Inc.

Good Law
45 F. App'x 595
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 16, 2002No. 01-35447; D.C. No. CV-99-01354-FDBCalifornia792 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

The district court correctly determined that no loan contract was formed between Brundage-Bone Concrete Pumping, Inc. (“Brundage-Bone”) and Concord Commercial Division of HSBC Business Loans, Inc. (“Concord”). The parties never had a meeting of the minds as to a material term of the contract- — how the collateral would be valued. Although Brundage-Bone requested that the loan officer delete “quick sale” value from the definition of “wholesale value,” the parties never agreed upon an alternate definition of the term. Brundage-Bone points to correspondence in which the loan officer allegedly “confirmed” that his understanding of wholesale value was the same as Brundage-Bone’s. These “confirmations,” however, occurred much later in the negotiation process and were consistent with the loan officer’s testimony that Brundage-B one’s desire to use dealer cost was not discussed at the loan proposal stage and did not become apparent until late November. In any event, it is clear that Brundage-Bone’s understanding of the term “wholesale value” was never communicated to anyone with loan approval authority at Concord.

“[T]he existence of mutual assent or a meeting of the minds…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.