United States v. James William Stewart

99 F.3d 1148 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James William STEWART, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-50063. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 11, 1996. * Decided Oct. 18, 1996. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, T.G. NELSON and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 James Stewart appeals the district court's order revoking his supervised release. The revocation was based on Stewart's failure to report to his probation officer upon release from imprisonment. I. FACTS 3 In 1991, Stewart pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting bank robbery. The district court sentenced Stewart to sixty three months in custody to be followed by a three-year period of supervised release. Stewart's imprisonment ended on August 30, 1995, at which time he was instructed by his probation officer, Peter Bosque, to report to the Probation Office in San Diego, California, on August 31, 1995. Stewart did not personally report…