Garcia

Garcia v. Garcia

Good Law
45 F. App'x 768
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 4, 2002No. 01-55191; D.C. No. CV-00-04245-ABCCalifornia996 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Petitioner Eugene Pascual Garcia was convicted for committing a lewd act upon a child under 14 years old in violation of California Penal Code § 288(a) and continuous child abuse in violation of California Penal Code § 288.5. After an unsuccessful direct appeal, Petitioner’s state-court petitions for a writ of habeas corpus were denied without comment. Petitioner then filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in federal court, which the district court denied.

Petitioner argues that admission of pretrial interviews of the victim, Nicole A., in which law enforcement used “highly suggestive interview tactics,” combined with Nicole’s memory loss at trial violated his rights under the Confrontation and Due Process Clauses. Petitioner also maintains that California Evidence Code §§ 1252, 1253, and 1360 were unconstitutional as applied in violation of his rights under the Confrontation and Due Process Clauses, because the hearsay statements did not contain adequate indicia of reliability. After oral argument, we expanded the Certificate of Appealability to include Petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims for trial counsel’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.