United States of America, Ex Rel., Don H. Haycock v. Hughes Aircraft Company

99 F.3d 1148 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, ex rel., Don H. HAYCOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 94-55620, 94-55826. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 15, 1995. Decided Oct. 21, 1996. 1 Before: T.G. NELSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges, and WILKEN, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 After reviewing the record de novo, Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, 24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir.1994), we conclude that Haycock presented no evidence of fraud or false statement. We are unable to identify, in the evidence submitted, fraudulent allocations of employees to the direct as opposed to the indirect categories, double billing, or fraudulent accounting practices. Nor can we identify a cost accounting standard which Appellee was required to follow and did not follow. There is no evidence in the record which we have been able to find to show that…