Kennard

United States v. Kennard

Good Law
46 F. App'x 426
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 29, 2002No. 01-30346; D.C. No. CR-01-00013-a-JMFCalifornia879 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Defendant-Appellant Tony Allen Kennard (“Kennard”) appeals from the judgment of conviction and the sentence imposed by the district court, entered pursuant to his guilty plea agreement on six counts of visa fraud and two counts of transportation of minors for illegal purposes in violation of the Mann Act. Kennard contends that he has the right to appeal, notwithstanding the fact that he waived his right to do so in the plea agreement, because his guilty plea was involuntary. Despite the fact that he was sentenced within the appropriate Sentencing Guidelines range, Kennard further asserts that the district court improperly denied several bases for a downward departure. We affirm.

I

Kennard did not expressly object before the district court on the ground that his guilty plea was involuntary, nor did he move to withdraw it. In the plea agreement, however, Kennard reserved his right to appeal his conviction and sentence on the ground that his plea was involuntary. Because we consider that reservation to recognize the due process interest in entering a plea free of coercion, we deem the issue properly preserved for appeal. Accordingly, we review de novo whether the plea…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.