Grant
United States v. Grant
Opinion
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Steven Grant appeals his conviction and 21-month sentence imposed following his jury-trial conviction for using an unauthorized access device, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029 (a)(2). Grant’s attorney has filed a brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Grant has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Counsel identifies three potential issues for review, the first of which is whether there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s guilty verdict. The evidence, and the reasonable inferences to be drawn from it, showed that Grant participated in the purchase of a $3,800 watch with a fraudulent credit card, fled from the police when identified by the victim, and had in his possession materials related to the use and creation of fraudulent credit cards. We therefore conclude that the verdict is supported by sufficient evidence. See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); 18 U.S.C. § 1029 (a)(2); see also 18 U.S.C. § 2 (providing that those who aid and abet the commission of an offense are punishable as a principal).