Vizcarra-Camacho

United States v. Vizcarra-Camacho

Good Law
46 F. App'x 507
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 18, 2002No. 98-50264; D.C. No. CR-97-01908-NAJCalifornia248 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Omar Vizcarra-Camacho appeals from his 51-month sentence and conviction by Jury trial for one count of conspiracy to import marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 & 960. Vizcarra-Camacho’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw as counsel of record. VizcarraCamacho did not file a pro se supplemental brief.

Counsel has raised the potential issue of whether the district court erred by applying a four-level upward adjustment for a leadership role. We agree with counsel’s conclusion that the issue is without merit because the record shows that: VizcarraCamacho recruited over one-hundred drivers to smuggle marijuana across the boarder, Vizcarra-Camacho was responsible for paying the smugglers, and instructed them on how to carry out their tasks. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1 cmt. note 3 (stating that a leader organizer enhancement may be appropriate where a defendant exercises decision making authority, recruits accomplices, and otherwise exercises control over others); United States v. Berry, 258 F.3d 971, 977-78 (9th Cir.2001).

Our independent review of the record…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.