McCahill

United States v. McCahill

Good Law
46 F. App'x 558
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 19, 2002No. 02-10045; D.C. No. CR-99-00213-PGRCalifornia251 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

James Robert McCahill appeals his 15-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for two counts of attempted tax evasion, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201 . We review de novo a district court’s determination that it lacked discretion to depart. United States v. Tucker, 133 F.3d 1208, 1214 (9th Cir.1998). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742 , and we vacate and remand.

McCahill contends, and the government agrees, that the district court failed to recognize that it had the discretion under the sentencing guidelines to depart downward six months to allow the sentence in this matter to run fully concurrent with an undischarged federal sentence. We agree, and conclude that the district court did have that authority. See United States v. Kimble, 107 F.3d 712, 715 (9th Cir.1997) (stating that under U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(c), a district court can impose a sentence “concurrent with or without credit for time served”); United States v. Sanchez-Rodriguez, 161 F.3d 556, 563-64 (9th Cir.1998) (en banc) (concluding that, under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0, a district court can depart based on the lost opportunity to serve a greater portion of a state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.